|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184638
Summary: Generate XMP for raw files Product: digikam Version: unspecified Platform: MS Windows OS/Version: MS Windows Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: wishlist Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: [hidden email] ReportedBy: [hidden email] Version: (using KDE 4.2.0) OS: MS Windows Installed from: MS Windows XMP files do no seem to be generated for raw files. As such a generation does not change the file itself, why not having XMP files being generated for raw files ? Frederic -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184638
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|general |Metadata Version|unspecified |0.10.0-svn --- Comment #1 from 2009-02-17 13:59:58 --- First. I hate XMP side-car concept. i will never implement something like that. Second, a new option exist to save metadata to RAW files. Currently supported by Exiv2 library are DNG, NEF, and PEF. Others will supported by Exiv2 in the future. So updating Exiv2 later and digiKAm support it automatically. Gilles Caulier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from frederic.gedin@free.fr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184638
--- Comment #2 from 2009-02-17 14:29:27 --- Gilles Thank you for your answer. One thing I do not understand: if you hate XMP side car concept, why is it implemented for JPEG images ? On my side, I am really careful on software that attempts to write inside raw files. Let's wait for the future to see how reliable it will be. Regards. Frederic -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from frederic.gedin@free.fr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184638
--- Comment #3 from 2009-02-17 14:37:57 --- >why is it implemented for JPEG images ? digiKam never create XMP side-car files (:=))) ==> a photo = image data + metadata. we never separate both. ==> if file format do not support metadata we use database. Gilles Caulier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from frederic.gedin@free.fr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184638
Sherwood Botsford <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #4 from Sherwood Botsford <sgbotsford gmail com> 2009-04-05 18:25:28 --- And if the database is corrupted you lose meta-data. Bad! Redundency is good. Even if Digikam NEVER used them except to rebuild it's database, it's not unreasonable to support them, especially if there is some standard format for them. This may make it easier for importing and exporting data to other photo programs. E.g. you could have a manual: Export Metadata to XMP files. And a verify XMP. When digikam exported it, it saved a checksum in it's database. If the XMP now has a different checksum, then something besides digikam has played with it. If digikam has never seen it before, it's a potential way to get info into digikam. I would ask that you consider using a small value for 'never' (grin) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from frederic.gedin@free.fr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184638
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|0.10.0-svn |0.10.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from frederic.gedin@free.fr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184638
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |[hidden email] Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com> 2010-06-07 09:37:27 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 220545 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
