[Bug 179012] New: advanced search missing negative conditions (changed from 0.9)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
25 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 179012] advanced search missing negative conditions (changed from 0.9)

Bugzilla from kilrae@kilrae.ca
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179012





--- Comment #17 from kilrae kilrae ca  2009-01-10 23:32:31 ---
Is it not possible to get them onto two lines as in my mockup? There certainly
seems to be enough space given the size of the field underneath. There should
maybe be some indication that "Meet all" is the default before you click show
options.


--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 179012] advanced search missing negative conditions (changed from 0.9)

Marcel Wiesweg
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from kilrae@kilrae.ca
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179012





--- Comment #18 from Marcel Wiesweg <marcel wiesweg gmx de>  2009-01-10 23:58:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=30117)
 --> (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=30117)
Put options in two lines as suggested


--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 179012] advanced search missing negative conditions (changed from 0.9)

Bugzilla from mikmach@wp.pl
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from kilrae@kilrae.ca
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179012





--- Comment #19 from Mikolaj Machowski <mikmach wp pl>  2009-01-11 23:52:54 ---
Looks nice. BTW why not just dropdown list?


--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 179012] advanced search missing negative conditions (changed from 0.9)

Marcel Wiesweg
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from kilrae@kilrae.ca
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179012


Marcel Wiesweg marcel wiesweg gmx de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




--- Comment #20 from Marcel Wiesweg <marcel wiesweg gmx de>  2009-01-13 15:39:02 ---
SVN commit 910536 by mwiesweg:

Offer options for negative search conditions in the search group header.
We offer four different options:
1) All of these conditions are met: (A && B && C)
2) Any of these conditions are met: (A || B || C)
3) At least one of these conditions is not met: !(A && B && C), (!A || !B ||!C)
4) None of these conditions are met: !(A || B || C), (!A && !B && !C)
with 1) being the default.
Intuition and UI wording of the negated versions use the (!A || !B ||!C) and
(!A && !B && !C)
variant, while the stored search XML and the generated SQL will use !(A && B &&
C) and
!(A || B || C) according to de Morgan. This explains why the code is a bit more
complicated than I expected initially.

BUG: 179012

 M  +223 -20   searchgroup.cpp  
 M  +21 -1     searchgroup.h  
 M  +20 -0     searchview.cpp  


WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=910536


--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 179012] advanced search missing negative conditions (changed from 0.9)

Gilles Caulier-4
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from kilrae@kilrae.ca
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179012


Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|0.10.0-beta7                |0.10.0




--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
12