https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163286--- Comment #14 from Jens Mueller <tschenser gmx de> 2010-02-11 20:00:12 ---
> Because, all preveiw widget are not yet factorized. I have alredy factored
> a lots of code there, but i must take a care to not break all faster.
>
> Your idea will be possible when editor canvas and preview widget
> implementation will be merged, and also ported to pure Qt4. This is not
> yet the case.
That I truly understand. Also that you do not not want to make regressions and
for that I be at one with you. But my opinion for future stays the the same,
tools should act like current canvas do in case of zoom and histogram.
> The pure Qt4 port of preview widget is very important to the future.
> QScrollArea API must be used there. My first plan is to polish all digiKam
> API before to have a cleaned code to port.
Definitively right!
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Locked
