[Bug 158868] New: Non natural album sorting

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158868         
           Summary: Non natural album sorting
           Product: digikam
           Version: 0.9.2
          Platform: unspecified
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: NOR
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: digikam-devel kde org
        ReportedBy: kde-2 dotancohen com


Version:           0.9.2 (using KDE 3.5.8)
OS:                Linux

When the album names are numeric, they should be sorted in the natural way, not the logical way as is now. For instance, if a user has albums for each month of the year, they are currently in this order:
1
10
11
12
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158868         
caulier.gilles gmail com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|general                     |Albums GUI
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Arnd Baecker]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158868         




------- Additional Comments From arnd.baecker web de  2008-03-07 09:11 -------
This is also true for current svn.

The resorting seems to be done in  void AlbumFolderView::resort()
which calls AlbumFolderView::reparentItem .
However, I cannot see that any sorting takes place in the case of the folder
view, namely, in each step
    if (newParent)
        newParent->insertItem(folderItem);
    else
        insertItem(folderItem);
is done
To achieve some ordering here, the insertItem should not happen
at the end of the list, but at the right place.
Does this analysis make sense?

Actually, when ordering folders by date, the parents are correctly
sorted by date, but the items below come in a random order.
Origin of the problem is the same.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158868         




------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles gmail com  2008-03-07 09:19 -------
To Dotan #1,

To prevent this problem, just place "0" before 1,2,3,4...9. That work fine as well...

Gilles
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158868         




------- Additional Comments From kde-2 dotancohen com  2008-03-07 09:44 -------
I habitually do that. However, some other Digikam users that I know are annoyed by this. I install Ubuntu on friend's computers and tell them to let me know _all_ the usability issues that crop up. This is a common one, both in Digikam and in Konqueror (it is fixed in Dolphin).
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158868         




------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles gmail com  2008-03-07 09:54 -------
Yes, i have seen in Dolphin code.

Currently, KDE4 port of digiKam use the same Qt3 old/transition classes to render folder tree view everywhere. I need to port it in pure Qt4 using model/view programming. I study the code of Dolphin as ref. It still in my todo list

Gilles
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158868         




------- Additional Comments From kde-2 dotancohen com  2008-03-07 10:15 -------
Thanks Gilles. I appreciate all the amazing work done on Digikam. So long as the Qt4 version will be fixed then the Qt3 version can stay as it is in my opinion.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel