[Bug 158735] New: Date-delimited tags would be nice

[brianr]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158735         
           Summary: Date-delimited tags would be nice
           Product: digikam
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Ubuntu Packages
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: wishlist
          Priority: NOR
         Component: Tags
        AssignedTo: digikam-devel kde org
        ReportedBy: bcr wt net


Version:            (using KDE 3.5.9)
Installed from:    Ubuntu Packages

It would be nice if users could specify date ranges for specific tags so that they can be automatically excluded when tagging images created outside the qualifying dates. I.e. a set of tags could be marked up as per below:

Niagara Falls [2007-12-12 to 2007-12-15],   [2001-01-04 to 2002-01-01]
San Francisco [2007-05-06 to present]

Images taken in for a few days in December 2007 or January 2001 are the only ones that could be tagged with Niagara Falls.
Only images after May 2007 can be tagged as San Francisco.

Implementing this would greatly filter out the number of extraneous tags and make auto-complete more effective.

Brian
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[brianr]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158735         




------- Additional Comments From bcr wt net  2008-03-03 21:11 -------
Addendum:  For images that have already been tagged, it should be fairly straightforward to generate default tag date ranges by using the min/max
dates of the tagged images.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158735         




------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles gmail com  2008-03-27 14:34 -------
Marcel,

Same here: there is no entry in KDE4 database schema to support this whish...

Gilles Caulier
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158735         




------- Additional Comments From mikmach wp pl  2008-03-27 20:37 -------
I think this is too specific. Maybe with scripting backend, but for core
digiKam?
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158735         




------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles gmail com  2008-03-27 20:50 -------
Mik,

Well, thread is open (:=))). User can vote for this feature

Gilles Caulier
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158735         




------- Additional Comments From mikmach wp pl  2008-03-27 22:35 -------
IMO one of big drawback of bugzilla is lack of negative points ;)
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel