https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149485Joe Auman <
[hidden email]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |
[hidden email]
--- Comment #204 from Joe Auman <brain recall gmail com> 2009-06-02 23:27:13 ---
(In reply to comment #187)
> Parallelising the the energy computation and the seam removal in LqR can be
> done right away (a single OpenMP pragma is enough): I have now tried to
> parallelise the carving operation and, to my surprise, I actually got a
> performance loss. I have tested this on 2 and 4 core PC's and my results are
> that more threads -> less performance, suggesting that the overhead cost for
> this operation is too high. I could still try something a little more
> sophisticated, though.
Hi Carlo. Your results kind of alarmed me, so I went back and checked over some
things. It's been quite awhile since I multithreaded Energy_Map(), so I rebuilt
it running without any threads. To my surprise, I gained a significant
performance boost. I hope I haven't wasted too much of your time on this.
At this point I'm out of ideas.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Locked
