https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149485--- Comment #213 from Carlo Baldassi <carlobaldassi gmail com> 2009-06-11 15:52:56 ---
Gilles,
I understand the problem (well, kind of...), I was in fact suggesting to use
non-static functions instead (i.e. to include the progress functions in the
ContentAwareResizer class, and pass the class+function pointer to lqr). I'm not
sure it would work, though, I was just asking.
Anyway, if you want to patch the liblqr code please feel free to do it; you may
take the git repo version (which I think is almost the same as 0.4.1) and send
me a mail.
Carlo
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Locked
