[Bug 148382] overexposure indication already when fully "saturated"

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 148382] overexposure indication already when fully "saturated"

Dik Takken-2
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148382


Dik Takken d h j takken xs4all nl changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[hidden email]




--- Comment #11 from Dik Takken <d h j takken xs4all nl>  2008-10-05 14:03:30 ---
Overexposure == clipping. When any one channel gets clipped, you have
overexposure.  IMHO, #4 is the way to go.

The same thing is true for clipping on the bottom end. Take a bright color,
like (250,10,10). When this color is darkened by the amount of 50, it changes
to (200,0,0). That color looks quite different, due to clipping. And because it
is a fairly bright color, this form of clipping is very well visible.
Therefore, it should be indicated as being underexposed.

So, I'd say:

if (expoSettings->underExposureIndicator &&
     pix.red() == 0 || pix.green() == 0 || pix.blue() == 0)


--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel