Aw
Locked
12
12
 
|
I will try that! Btw, I have seen a printout when exiting something about a linked list. And when I see that I have to kill digikam with ctrl-c. /Anders S Den 25 maj 2014 11:54 skrev "Gilles Caulier" <[hidden email]>:
Clean up all and replace -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=release by _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
I have built again with debugfull and I see this from time to time when doing refocus: But not always!digikam(6599)/digikam (core) Digikam::EditorToolThreaded::slotPreview: Preview "Sharpen" started... digikam(6599)/digikam (core) Digikam::EditorToolThreaded::slotFilterFinished: Preview "Sharpen" failed... digikam(6599)/digikam (core) Digikam::DImgThreadedFilter::startFilter: "Refocus" ::No valid image data !!! ... 2014-05-25 12:00 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>:
_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Just to be sure, can you share with me some image samples please ?
Gilles Caulier 2014-05-27 9:33 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: > I have built again with debugfull and I see this from time to time when > doing refocus: > digikam(6599)/digikam (core) Digikam::EditorToolThreaded::slotPreview: > Preview "Sharpen" started... > digikam(6599)/digikam (core) > Digikam::EditorToolThreaded::slotFilterFinished: Preview "Sharpen" > failed... > digikam(6599)/digikam (core) Digikam::DImgThreadedFilter::startFilter: > "Refocus" ::No valid image data !!! ... > > But not always! > > /Anders > > > 2014-05-25 12:00 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: > >> I will try that! >> >> Btw, I have seen a printout when exiting something about a linked list. >> And when I see that I have to kill digikam with ctrl-c. >> >> /Anders S >> >> Den 25 maj 2014 11:54 skrev "Gilles Caulier" <[hidden email]>: >> >>> Clean up all and replace -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=release by >>> -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=debugfull >>> >>> This is what i use here. The advantage when a crash appear is to have >>> a suitable backtrace as well... >>> >>> Gilles Caulier >>> >>> 2014-05-25 11:50 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >>> > In my case I have built it myself. I do like this (form root of >>> > unpacked >>> > digikam-4.0.0.tar.bz2): >>> > cmake -DDIGIKAMSC_USE_PRIVATE_KDEGRAPHICS=on -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=release >>> > -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=<install path> -DENABLE_LCMS2=on >>> > -DDIGIKAMSC_COMPILE_DOC=on -DDIGIKAMSC_CHECKOUT_PO=off -Wno-dev . >>> > >>> > make -j 4 >>> > >>> > make install >>> > >>> > >>> > This have worked for all the latest releases. >>> > >>> > /Anders S >>> > >>> > 2014-05-25 8:54 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>: >>> > >>> >> Hum, no idea anymore... >>> >> >>> >> If i understand, your 4.0.0 come from a dedicated packaging. Perhaps >>> >> it's compiled with debug symbols, which can introduce some time >>> >> latency at editor core and prevent some di-synchronization... Here as >>> >> developer it's compiled like this... >>> >> >>> >> Why not to compile and install current code yourself ? The advantage >>> >> is to use last changes/fix that you can try in live following my work. >>> >> >>> >> It can be done in parallel of official release (3.5.0). Look here for >>> >> details : >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/graphics/digikam/digikam-software-compilation/repository/revisions/master/entry/README.LOCAL >>> >> >>> >> Gilles Caulier >>> >> >>> >> 2014-05-24 16:24 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >>> >> > I have tested with and without color management with the same result >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > 2014-05-24 13:29 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier >>> >> > <[hidden email]>: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> 2014-05-24 13:03 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >>> >> >> > 2014-05-24 12:43 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <[hidden email]>: >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 12:30:33, Gilles Caulier wrote: >>> >> >> >> > 2014-05-24 12:17 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <[hidden email]>: >>> >> >> >> > > On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 12:15:10, Gilles Caulier wrote: >>> >> >> >> > >> There is an important setup to check on your computer. >>> >> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> > >> I see dysfunction and time latency introduced in digiKam >>> >> >> >> > >> when >>> >> >> >> > >> you >>> >> >> >> > >> use >>> >> >> >> > >> exotic widget style with KDE application >>> >> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> > >> A lots of widget styles are bugous. Here i always used >>> >> >> >> > >> Oxygen >>> >> >> >> > >> style >>> >> >> >> > >> which is official and default used by KDE. And here all is >>> >> >> >> > >> fine. >>> >> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> > >> For ex, Non KDE distro (as Ubuntu) do not use Oxygen widget >>> >> >> >> > >> style. >>> >> >> >> > >> This can introduce problems... >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> > > I use QtCurve, is that exotic? >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > If i remember well, yes. I see some words about in KDE mailing >>> >> >> >> > list. >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > Change widget style from digiKam config panel through MISC >>> >> >> >> > Settings >>> >> >> >> > page... >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> This has no appearent effect on the missizing of the previews, >>> >> >> >> or >>> >> >> >> the >>> >> >> >> stickyness of them, nor on the intepretation of the radius >>> >> >> >> parameter >>> >> >> >> in >>> >> >> >> the >>> >> >> >> unsharp mask tool - it just makes digikam look like I use >>> >> >> >> oxygen... >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > Switching style has no effect in my setup! >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > In my case it's even sometimes not working to push "Try", nothing >>> >> >> > happens. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > And I have tested even more now and it always problems with >>> >> >> > images >>> >> >> > that >>> >> >> > has >>> >> >> > been resized and it always works on images with original size. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > Should I try with KDE 4.13 instead? What QT is preferred? >>> >> >> >>> >> >> This has no incidence here >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Do you use Color Management ? >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Gilles Caulier >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> >> Digikam-users mailing list >>> >> >> [hidden email] >>> >> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >>> >> > Digikam-users mailing list >>> >> > [hidden email] >>> >> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> >> > >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Digikam-users mailing list >>> >> [hidden email] >>> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Digikam-users mailing list >>> > [hidden email] >>> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Hi Gilles! BTW, I have tested with a precompiled digiKam and it behaves the same for me.I sent you a message with a link to an image! 2014-05-27 9:36 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>: Just to be sure, can you share with me some image samples please ? _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
No problem here...
https://www.flickr.com/photos/digikam/14278118971/sizes/o/ Perhaps, there is a problem with your database (i don't know why...) Just to be sure, load images to Shofoto and apply Sharpen filter to see if dysfunction is here. Showfoto use same implementation than Image Editor but without DB dependency. Gilles Caulier 2014-05-27 10:12 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: > Hi Gilles! > > I sent you a message with a link to an image! > > BTW, I have tested with a precompiled digiKam and it behaves the same for > me. > > Anyone out there on openSUSE 13.1 with a working digiKam 4.0.0? > > /Anders > > > 2014-05-27 9:36 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>: > >> Just to be sure, can you share with me some image samples please ? >> >> Gilles Caulier >> >> 2014-05-27 9:33 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >> > I have built again with debugfull and I see this from time to time when >> > doing refocus: >> > digikam(6599)/digikam (core) Digikam::EditorToolThreaded::slotPreview: >> > Preview "Sharpen" started... >> > digikam(6599)/digikam (core) >> > Digikam::EditorToolThreaded::slotFilterFinished: Preview "Sharpen" >> > failed... >> > digikam(6599)/digikam (core) Digikam::DImgThreadedFilter::startFilter: >> > "Refocus" ::No valid image data !!! ... >> > >> > But not always! >> > >> > /Anders >> > >> > >> > 2014-05-25 12:00 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >> > >> >> I will try that! >> >> >> >> Btw, I have seen a printout when exiting something about a linked list. >> >> And when I see that I have to kill digikam with ctrl-c. >> >> >> >> /Anders S >> >> >> >> Den 25 maj 2014 11:54 skrev "Gilles Caulier" >> >> <[hidden email]>: >> >> >> >>> Clean up all and replace -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=release by >> >>> -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=debugfull >> >>> >> >>> This is what i use here. The advantage when a crash appear is to have >> >>> a suitable backtrace as well... >> >>> >> >>> Gilles Caulier >> >>> >> >>> 2014-05-25 11:50 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >> >>> > In my case I have built it myself. I do like this (form root of >> >>> > unpacked >> >>> > digikam-4.0.0.tar.bz2): >> >>> > cmake -DDIGIKAMSC_USE_PRIVATE_KDEGRAPHICS=on >> >>> > -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=release >> >>> > -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=<install path> -DENABLE_LCMS2=on >> >>> > -DDIGIKAMSC_COMPILE_DOC=on -DDIGIKAMSC_CHECKOUT_PO=off -Wno-dev . >> >>> > >> >>> > make -j 4 >> >>> > >> >>> > make install >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > This have worked for all the latest releases. >> >>> > >> >>> > /Anders S >> >>> > >> >>> > 2014-05-25 8:54 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>: >> >>> > >> >>> >> Hum, no idea anymore... >> >>> >> >> >>> >> If i understand, your 4.0.0 come from a dedicated packaging. >> >>> >> Perhaps >> >>> >> it's compiled with debug symbols, which can introduce some time >> >>> >> latency at editor core and prevent some di-synchronization... Here >> >>> >> as >> >>> >> developer it's compiled like this... >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Why not to compile and install current code yourself ? The >> >>> >> advantage >> >>> >> is to use last changes/fix that you can try in live following my >> >>> >> work. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> It can be done in parallel of official release (3.5.0). Look here >> >>> >> for >> >>> >> details : >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/graphics/digikam/digikam-software-compilation/repository/revisions/master/entry/README.LOCAL >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Gilles Caulier >> >>> >> >> >>> >> 2014-05-24 16:24 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >> >>> >> > I have tested with and without color management with the same >> >>> >> > result >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > 2014-05-24 13:29 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier >> >>> >> > <[hidden email]>: >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> 2014-05-24 13:03 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >> >>> >> >> > 2014-05-24 12:43 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <[hidden email]>: >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 12:30:33, Gilles Caulier wrote: >> >>> >> >> >> > 2014-05-24 12:17 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <[hidden email]>: >> >>> >> >> >> > > On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 12:15:10, Gilles Caulier >> >>> >> >> >> > > wrote: >> >>> >> >> >> > >> There is an important setup to check on your computer. >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> I see dysfunction and time latency introduced in digiKam >> >>> >> >> >> > >> when >> >>> >> >> >> > >> you >> >>> >> >> >> > >> use >> >>> >> >> >> > >> exotic widget style with KDE application >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> A lots of widget styles are bugous. Here i always used >> >>> >> >> >> > >> Oxygen >> >>> >> >> >> > >> style >> >>> >> >> >> > >> which is official and default used by KDE. And here all >> >>> >> >> >> > >> is >> >>> >> >> >> > >> fine. >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> For ex, Non KDE distro (as Ubuntu) do not use Oxygen >> >>> >> >> >> > >> widget >> >>> >> >> >> > >> style. >> >>> >> >> >> > >> This can introduce problems... >> >>> >> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> >> > > I use QtCurve, is that exotic? >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> > If i remember well, yes. I see some words about in KDE >> >>> >> >> >> > mailing >> >>> >> >> >> > list. >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> > Change widget style from digiKam config panel through MISC >> >>> >> >> >> > Settings >> >>> >> >> >> > page... >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> This has no appearent effect on the missizing of the >> >>> >> >> >> previews, >> >>> >> >> >> or >> >>> >> >> >> the >> >>> >> >> >> stickyness of them, nor on the intepretation of the radius >> >>> >> >> >> parameter >> >>> >> >> >> in >> >>> >> >> >> the >> >>> >> >> >> unsharp mask tool - it just makes digikam look like I use >> >>> >> >> >> oxygen... >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > Switching style has no effect in my setup! >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > In my case it's even sometimes not working to push "Try", >> >>> >> >> > nothing >> >>> >> >> > happens. >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > And I have tested even more now and it always problems with >> >>> >> >> > images >> >>> >> >> > that >> >>> >> >> > has >> >>> >> >> > been resized and it always works on images with original size. >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > Should I try with KDE 4.13 instead? What QT is preferred? >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> This has no incidence here >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Do you use Color Management ? >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Gilles Caulier >> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >>> >> >> Digikam-users mailing list >> >>> >> >> [hidden email] >> >>> >> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >>> >> > Digikam-users mailing list >> >>> >> > [hidden email] >> >>> >> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >>> >> Digikam-users mailing list >> >>> >> [hidden email] >> >>> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > _______________________________________________ >> >>> > Digikam-users mailing list >> >>> > [hidden email] >> >>> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> >>> > >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Digikam-users mailing list >> >>> [hidden email] >> >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Digikam-users mailing list >> > [hidden email] >> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Same thing happens with showfoto. And as with digiKam, only if the images has been resized before!
2014-05-27 10:39 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>: No problem here... _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Ok, give me exactly all precise steps that you do in digiKam to
reproduce the diysfunction here... Gilles 2014-05-27 10:52 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: > Same thing happens with showfoto. > > And as with digiKam, only if the images has been resized before! > > /Anders > > > 2014-05-27 10:39 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>: > >> No problem here... >> >> https://www.flickr.com/photos/digikam/14278118971/sizes/o/ >> >> Perhaps, there is a problem with your database (i don't know why...) >> >> Just to be sure, load images to Shofoto and apply Sharpen filter to >> see if dysfunction is here. Showfoto use same implementation than >> Image Editor but without DB dependency. >> >> Gilles Caulier >> >> 2014-05-27 10:12 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >> > Hi Gilles! >> > >> > I sent you a message with a link to an image! >> > >> > BTW, I have tested with a precompiled digiKam and it behaves the same >> > for >> > me. >> > >> > Anyone out there on openSUSE 13.1 with a working digiKam 4.0.0? >> > >> > /Anders >> > >> > >> > 2014-05-27 9:36 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>: >> > >> >> Just to be sure, can you share with me some image samples please ? >> >> >> >> Gilles Caulier >> >> >> >> 2014-05-27 9:33 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >> >> > I have built again with debugfull and I see this from time to time >> >> > when >> >> > doing refocus: >> >> > digikam(6599)/digikam (core) >> >> > Digikam::EditorToolThreaded::slotPreview: >> >> > Preview "Sharpen" started... >> >> > digikam(6599)/digikam (core) >> >> > Digikam::EditorToolThreaded::slotFilterFinished: Preview "Sharpen" >> >> > failed... >> >> > digikam(6599)/digikam (core) >> >> > Digikam::DImgThreadedFilter::startFilter: >> >> > "Refocus" ::No valid image data !!! ... >> >> > >> >> > But not always! >> >> > >> >> > /Anders >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > 2014-05-25 12:00 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >> >> > >> >> >> I will try that! >> >> >> >> >> >> Btw, I have seen a printout when exiting something about a linked >> >> >> list. >> >> >> And when I see that I have to kill digikam with ctrl-c. >> >> >> >> >> >> /Anders S >> >> >> >> >> >> Den 25 maj 2014 11:54 skrev "Gilles Caulier" >> >> >> <[hidden email]>: >> >> >> >> >> >>> Clean up all and replace -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=release by >> >> >>> -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=debugfull >> >> >>> >> >> >>> This is what i use here. The advantage when a crash appear is to >> >> >>> have >> >> >>> a suitable backtrace as well... >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Gilles Caulier >> >> >>> >> >> >>> 2014-05-25 11:50 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >> >> >>> > In my case I have built it myself. I do like this (form root of >> >> >>> > unpacked >> >> >>> > digikam-4.0.0.tar.bz2): >> >> >>> > cmake -DDIGIKAMSC_USE_PRIVATE_KDEGRAPHICS=on >> >> >>> > -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=release >> >> >>> > -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=<install path> -DENABLE_LCMS2=on >> >> >>> > -DDIGIKAMSC_COMPILE_DOC=on -DDIGIKAMSC_CHECKOUT_PO=off -Wno-dev . >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > make -j 4 >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > make install >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > This have worked for all the latest releases. >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > /Anders S >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > 2014-05-25 8:54 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier >> >> >>> > <[hidden email]>: >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> Hum, no idea anymore... >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> If i understand, your 4.0.0 come from a dedicated packaging. >> >> >>> >> Perhaps >> >> >>> >> it's compiled with debug symbols, which can introduce some time >> >> >>> >> latency at editor core and prevent some di-synchronization... >> >> >>> >> Here >> >> >>> >> as >> >> >>> >> developer it's compiled like this... >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> Why not to compile and install current code yourself ? The >> >> >>> >> advantage >> >> >>> >> is to use last changes/fix that you can try in live following my >> >> >>> >> work. >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> It can be done in parallel of official release (3.5.0). Look >> >> >>> >> here >> >> >>> >> for >> >> >>> >> details : >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/graphics/digikam/digikam-software-compilation/repository/revisions/master/entry/README.LOCAL >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> Gilles Caulier >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> 2014-05-24 16:24 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >> >> >>> >> > I have tested with and without color management with the same >> >> >>> >> > result >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > 2014-05-24 13:29 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier >> >> >>> >> > <[hidden email]>: >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> 2014-05-24 13:03 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund >> >> >>> >> >> <[hidden email]>: >> >> >>> >> >> > 2014-05-24 12:43 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <[hidden email]>: >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> >> On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 12:30:33, Gilles Caulier wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >> > 2014-05-24 12:17 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund >> >> >>> >> >> >> > <[hidden email]>: >> >> >>> >> >> >> > > On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 12:15:10, Gilles Caulier >> >> >>> >> >> >> > > wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> There is an important setup to check on your >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> computer. >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> I see dysfunction and time latency introduced in >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> digiKam >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> when >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> you >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> use >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> exotic widget style with KDE application >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> A lots of widget styles are bugous. Here i always >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> used >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> Oxygen >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> style >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> which is official and default used by KDE. And here >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> all >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> is >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> fine. >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> For ex, Non KDE distro (as Ubuntu) do not use Oxygen >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> widget >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> style. >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> This can introduce problems... >> >> >>> >> >> >> > > >> >> >>> >> >> >> > > I use QtCurve, is that exotic? >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> >> > If i remember well, yes. I see some words about in KDE >> >> >>> >> >> >> > mailing >> >> >>> >> >> >> > list. >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> >> > Change widget style from digiKam config panel through >> >> >>> >> >> >> > MISC >> >> >>> >> >> >> > Settings >> >> >>> >> >> >> > page... >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> This has no appearent effect on the missizing of the >> >> >>> >> >> >> previews, >> >> >>> >> >> >> or >> >> >>> >> >> >> the >> >> >>> >> >> >> stickyness of them, nor on the intepretation of the radius >> >> >>> >> >> >> parameter >> >> >>> >> >> >> in >> >> >>> >> >> >> the >> >> >>> >> >> >> unsharp mask tool - it just makes digikam look like I use >> >> >>> >> >> >> oxygen... >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> > Switching style has no effect in my setup! >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> > In my case it's even sometimes not working to push "Try", >> >> >>> >> >> > nothing >> >> >>> >> >> > happens. >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> > And I have tested even more now and it always problems with >> >> >>> >> >> > images >> >> >>> >> >> > that >> >> >>> >> >> > has >> >> >>> >> >> > been resized and it always works on images with original >> >> >>> >> >> > size. >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> > Should I try with KDE 4.13 instead? What QT is preferred? >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> This has no incidence here >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Do you use Color Management ? >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Gilles Caulier >> >> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> >> >> Digikam-users mailing list >> >> >>> >> >> [hidden email] >> >> >>> >> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> >> > Digikam-users mailing list >> >> >>> >> > [hidden email] >> >> >>> >> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> >> Digikam-users mailing list >> >> >>> >> [hidden email] >> >> >>> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> > Digikam-users mailing list >> >> >>> > [hidden email] >> >> >>> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> Digikam-users mailing list >> >> >>> [hidden email] >> >> >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > Digikam-users mailing list >> >> > [hidden email] >> >> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Digikam-users mailing list >> >> [hidden email] >> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Digikam-users mailing list >> > [hidden email] >> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Anders Stedtlund
Þann þri 27.maí 2014 08:12, skrifaði Anders Stedtlund:
> Hi Gilles! > > I sent you a message with a link to an image! > > BTW, I have tested with a precompiled digiKam and it behaves > the same for me. > > Anyone out there on openSUSE 13.1 with a working digiKam 4.0.0? > > /Anders Tested on openSUSE 13.1 (in Virtualbox): Browsing to software.opensuse.org/package/digikam (or search for digikam), select digikam, select "Show other versions", select "Show unstable packages" below openSUSE 13.1 official release, gives you digiKam version 4.0.0 from the KDE:Extra repository. --> 1 Click Install opened with Yast2 leads through the setup, resolves dependencies and finalizes as digiKam 4.0.0-10.1 Nice splash screen, a lake with bridges. Sharpening/refocus seems to work OK, tested on some JPEGs. Best regards, Sveinn í Felli _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
#1: #2:Start digiKam F4 (edit image) #3: Resize image (now zoom still shows 20% even if image has been resized to 20x30 from 2000x3000 pixles and the image is shown very blurry beacuse it fits to screen.) #4: Open sharpen #5: Zoom in to make the image not fit to window. #6: Click "Try" to test sharpen. #7: Move mouse cursor back and forward to se Before/After. After image is very strange. /Anders 2014-05-27 10:54 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>: Ok, give me exactly all precise steps that you do in digiKam to _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Sveinn í Felli-2
Thanks Sveinn! Might be something wrong with my installation then... /Anders2014-05-27 11:01 GMT+02:00 Sveinn í Felli <[hidden email]>: Þann þri 27.maí 2014 08:12, skrifaði Anders Stedtlund: _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Þann þri 27.maí 2014 09:05, skrifaði Anders Stedtlund:
> Thanks Sveinn! Might be something wrong with my installation > then... > > /Anders Maybe not. Tested your steps to reproduce and saw some strange things: Opened an image 1280x960 in the editor, zoom level to fit in window reads 85%. Then resized it to 200x150; zoom still reports it as 85% fit to window. Selected sharpening; still fit to window at 85%, clicked on 1:1 and zoom goes to 100% - BUT only the "before" preview image seems to respect that, the "after" preview is out of sync and seems even stretched. Tested again, but this time by saving the image between operations; this time the zoom levels and preview display are correct. Hope my descripion is clear. Food for thoughts... Sveinn í Felli > > 2014-05-27 11:01 GMT+02:00 Sveinn í Felli <[hidden email] > <mailto:[hidden email]>>: > > Þann þri 27.maí 2014 08:12, skrifaði Anders Stedtlund: > > Hi Gilles! > > I sent you a message with a link to an image! > > BTW, I have tested with a precompiled digiKam and it > behaves > the same for me. > > Anyone out there on openSUSE 13.1 with a working > digiKam 4.0.0? > > /Anders > > > Tested on openSUSE 13.1 (in Virtualbox): > > Browsing to software.opensuse.org/package/__digikam > <http://software.opensuse.org/package/digikam> (or > search for digikam), select digikam, select "Show other > versions", select "Show unstable packages" below > openSUSE 13.1 official release, gives you digiKam > version 4.0.0 from the KDE:Extra repository. > --> 1 Click Install opened with Yast2 leads through the > setup, resolves dependencies and finalizes as digiKam > 4.0.0-10.1 > > Nice splash screen, a lake with bridges. > Sharpening/refocus seems to work OK, tested on some JPEGs. > > Best regards, > Sveinn í Felli > > > _________________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/__listinfo/digikam-users > <https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Ah, good to know Sveinn! Not just my install then! :-) I haven't tried to save between resize and sharpen. I usually do all my steps and then save!2014-05-27 11:32 GMT+02:00 Sveinn í Felli <[hidden email]>: Þann þri 27.maí 2014 09:05, skrifaði Anders Stedtlund: _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
patch to bootstrap.macports for parallel installations
|
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Hi Gilles
To facilitate parallel installations on OSX I suggest the following modification to bootstrap.macports: --- bootstrap.macports-orig 2014-05-26 00:19:16.000000000 +0200 +++ bootstrap.macports 2014-05-29 08:41:50.000000000 +0200 @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ INSTALL_PREFIX=$1 if [ "$INSTALL_PREFIX" = "" ]; then INSTALL_PREFIX=/opt/local + BUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR=/Applications/MacPorts/KDE4 +else + BUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR=${INSTALL_PREFIX}/Applications/MacPorts/KDE4 fi BUILD_TYPE=$2 @@ -56,7 +59,7 @@ -DCMAKE_INSTALL_NAME_DIR=/opt/local/lib \ -DCMAKE_SYSTEM_PREFIX_PATH="/opt/local;/usr" \ -DCMAKE_MODULE_PATH="/opt/local/share/cmake-2.8/Modules;/opt/local/share/cmake/modules" \ - -DBUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR=/Applications/MacPorts/KDE4 \ + -DBUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR=${BUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR} \ -DQT_QT_INCLUDE_DIR=/opt/local/include \ -DQT_LIBRARY_DIR=/opt/local/lib \ -DQT_QMAKE_EXECUTABLE=/opt/local/bin/qmake \ On 25/05/14 08:54, Gilles Caulier wrote: > Hum, no idea anymore... > > If i understand, your 4.0.0 come from a dedicated packaging. Perhaps > it's compiled with debug symbols, which can introduce some time > latency at editor core and prevent some di-synchronization... Here as > developer it's compiled like this... > > Why not to compile and install current code yourself ? The advantage > is to use last changes/fix that you can try in live following my work. > > It can be done in parallel of official release (3.5.0). Look here for details : > > https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/graphics/digikam/digikam-software-compilation/repository/revisions/master/entry/README.LOCAL > > Gilles Caulier > > 2014-05-24 16:24 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >> I have tested with and without color management with the same result >> >> >> 2014-05-24 13:29 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>: >>> >>> 2014-05-24 13:03 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >>>> 2014-05-24 12:43 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <[hidden email]>: >>>> >>>>> On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 12:30:33, Gilles Caulier wrote: >>>>>> 2014-05-24 12:17 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <[hidden email]>: >>>>>>> On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 12:15:10, Gilles Caulier wrote: >>>>>>>> There is an important setup to check on your computer. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I see dysfunction and time latency introduced in digiKam when you >>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>> exotic widget style with KDE application >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A lots of widget styles are bugous. Here i always used Oxygen >>>>>>>> style >>>>>>>> which is official and default used by KDE. And here all is fine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For ex, Non KDE distro (as Ubuntu) do not use Oxygen widget style. >>>>>>>> This can introduce problems... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I use QtCurve, is that exotic? >>>>>> >>>>>> If i remember well, yes. I see some words about in KDE mailing list. >>>>>> >>>>>> Change widget style from digiKam config panel through MISC Settings >>>>>> page... >>>>> >>>>> This has no appearent effect on the missizing of the previews, or the >>>>> stickyness of them, nor on the intepretation of the radius parameter in >>>>> the >>>>> unsharp mask tool - it just makes digikam look like I use oxygen... >>>> >>>> >>>> Switching style has no effect in my setup! >>>> >>>> In my case it's even sometimes not working to push "Try", nothing >>>> happens. >>>> >>>> And I have tested even more now and it always problems with images that >>>> has >>>> been resized and it always works on images with original size. >>>> >>>> Should I try with KDE 4.13 instead? What QT is preferred? >>> >>> This has no incidence here >>> >>> Do you use Color Management ? >>> >>> Gilles Caulier >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: patch to bootstrap.macports for parallel installations
|
|
Patch applied to git/master...
Gilles 2014-05-29 8:54 GMT+02:00 Phil <[hidden email]>: > Hi Gilles > > To facilitate parallel installations on OSX I suggest the following > modification to bootstrap.macports: > > --- bootstrap.macports-orig 2014-05-26 00:19:16.000000000 +0200 > +++ bootstrap.macports 2014-05-29 08:41:50.000000000 +0200 > @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ > INSTALL_PREFIX=$1 > if [ "$INSTALL_PREFIX" = "" ]; then > INSTALL_PREFIX=/opt/local > + BUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR=/Applications/MacPorts/KDE4 > +else > + BUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR=${INSTALL_PREFIX}/Applications/MacPorts/KDE4 > fi > > BUILD_TYPE=$2 > @@ -56,7 +59,7 @@ > -DCMAKE_INSTALL_NAME_DIR=/opt/local/lib \ > -DCMAKE_SYSTEM_PREFIX_PATH="/opt/local;/usr" \ > > -DCMAKE_MODULE_PATH="/opt/local/share/cmake-2.8/Modules;/opt/local/share/cmake/modules" > \ > - -DBUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR=/Applications/MacPorts/KDE4 \ > + -DBUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR=${BUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR} \ > -DQT_QT_INCLUDE_DIR=/opt/local/include \ > -DQT_LIBRARY_DIR=/opt/local/lib \ > -DQT_QMAKE_EXECUTABLE=/opt/local/bin/qmake \ > > > On 25/05/14 08:54, Gilles Caulier wrote: >> >> Hum, no idea anymore... >> >> If i understand, your 4.0.0 come from a dedicated packaging. Perhaps >> it's compiled with debug symbols, which can introduce some time >> latency at editor core and prevent some di-synchronization... Here as >> developer it's compiled like this... >> >> Why not to compile and install current code yourself ? The advantage >> is to use last changes/fix that you can try in live following my work. >> >> It can be done in parallel of official release (3.5.0). Look here for >> details : >> >> >> https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/graphics/digikam/digikam-software-compilation/repository/revisions/master/entry/README.LOCAL >> >> Gilles Caulier >> >> 2014-05-24 16:24 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >>> >>> I have tested with and without color management with the same result >>> >>> >>> 2014-05-24 13:29 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>: >>>> >>>> >>>> 2014-05-24 13:03 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >>>>> >>>>> 2014-05-24 12:43 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <[hidden email]>: >>>>> >>>>>> On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 12:30:33, Gilles Caulier wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2014-05-24 12:17 GMT+02:00 Anders Lund <[hidden email]>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Lørdag den 24. maj 2014 12:15:10, Gilles Caulier wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There is an important setup to check on your computer. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I see dysfunction and time latency introduced in digiKam when you >>>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>>> exotic widget style with KDE application >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> A lots of widget styles are bugous. Here i always used Oxygen >>>>>>>>> style >>>>>>>>> which is official and default used by KDE. And here all is fine. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For ex, Non KDE distro (as Ubuntu) do not use Oxygen widget style. >>>>>>>>> This can introduce problems... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I use QtCurve, is that exotic? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If i remember well, yes. I see some words about in KDE mailing list. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Change widget style from digiKam config panel through MISC Settings >>>>>>> page... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> This has no appearent effect on the missizing of the previews, or the >>>>>> stickyness of them, nor on the intepretation of the radius parameter >>>>>> in >>>>>> the >>>>>> unsharp mask tool - it just makes digikam look like I use oxygen... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Switching style has no effect in my setup! >>>>> >>>>> In my case it's even sometimes not working to push "Try", nothing >>>>> happens. >>>>> >>>>> And I have tested even more now and it always problems with images that >>>>> has >>>>> been resized and it always works on images with original size. >>>>> >>>>> Should I try with KDE 4.13 instead? What QT is preferred? >>>> >>>> >>>> This has no incidence here >>>> >>>> Do you use Color Management ? >>>> >>>> Gilles Caulier >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Anders Stedtlund
Can you take a look to this entry if it can be the origin (directly or
indirectly) of your problem ? Gilles Caulier 2014-05-27 11:34 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: > Ah, good to know Sveinn! Not just my install then! :-) > > I haven't tried to save between resize and sharpen. I usually do all my > steps and then save! > > /Anders > > > 2014-05-27 11:32 GMT+02:00 Sveinn í Felli <[hidden email]>: > >> Þann þri 27.maí 2014 09:05, skrifaði Anders Stedtlund: >> >>> Thanks Sveinn! Might be something wrong with my installation >>> then... >>> >>> /Anders >> >> >> Maybe not. Tested your steps to reproduce and saw some strange things: >> >> Opened an image 1280x960 in the editor, zoom level to fit in window reads >> 85%. Then resized it to 200x150; zoom still reports it as 85% fit to window. >> Selected sharpening; still fit to window at 85%, clicked on 1:1 and zoom >> goes to 100% - BUT only the "before" preview image seems to respect that, >> the "after" preview is out of sync and seems even stretched. >> >> Tested again, but this time by saving the image between operations; this >> time the zoom levels and preview display are correct. >> >> Hope my descripion is clear. >> >> Food for thoughts... >> >> Sveinn í Felli >> >>> >>> 2014-05-27 11:01 GMT+02:00 Sveinn í Felli <[hidden email] >>> <mailto:[hidden email]>>: >>> >>> >>> Þann þri 27.maí 2014 08:12, skrifaði Anders Stedtlund: >>> >>> Hi Gilles! >>> >>> I sent you a message with a link to an image! >>> >>> BTW, I have tested with a precompiled digiKam and it >>> behaves >>> the same for me. >>> >>> Anyone out there on openSUSE 13.1 with a working >>> digiKam 4.0.0? >>> >>> /Anders >>> >>> >>> Tested on openSUSE 13.1 (in Virtualbox): >>> >>> Browsing to software.opensuse.org/package/__digikam >>> <http://software.opensuse.org/package/digikam> (or >>> >>> search for digikam), select digikam, select "Show other >>> versions", select "Show unstable packages" below >>> openSUSE 13.1 official release, gives you digiKam >>> version 4.0.0 from the KDE:Extra repository. >>> --> 1 Click Install opened with Yast2 leads through the >>> setup, resolves dependencies and finalizes as digiKam >>> 4.0.0-10.1 >>> >>> Nice splash screen, a lake with bridges. >>> Sharpening/refocus seems to work OK, tested on some JPEGs. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Sveinn í Felli >>> >>> >>> _________________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/__listinfo/digikam-users >>> <https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Which entry?
/Anders 2014-06-03 10:42 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>: > Can you take a look to this entry if it can be the origin (directly or > indirectly) of your problem ? > > Gilles Caulier > > 2014-05-27 11:34 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >> Ah, good to know Sveinn! Not just my install then! :-) >> >> I haven't tried to save between resize and sharpen. I usually do all my >> steps and then save! >> >> /Anders >> >> >> 2014-05-27 11:32 GMT+02:00 Sveinn í Felli <[hidden email]>: >> >>> Þann þri 27.maí 2014 09:05, skrifaði Anders Stedtlund: >>> >>>> Thanks Sveinn! Might be something wrong with my installation >>>> then... >>>> >>>> /Anders >>> >>> >>> Maybe not. Tested your steps to reproduce and saw some strange things: >>> >>> Opened an image 1280x960 in the editor, zoom level to fit in window reads >>> 85%. Then resized it to 200x150; zoom still reports it as 85% fit to window. >>> Selected sharpening; still fit to window at 85%, clicked on 1:1 and zoom >>> goes to 100% - BUT only the "before" preview image seems to respect that, >>> the "after" preview is out of sync and seems even stretched. >>> >>> Tested again, but this time by saving the image between operations; this >>> time the zoom levels and preview display are correct. >>> >>> Hope my descripion is clear. >>> >>> Food for thoughts... >>> >>> Sveinn í Felli >>> >>>> >>>> 2014-05-27 11:01 GMT+02:00 Sveinn í Felli <[hidden email] >>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>>: >>>> >>>> >>>> Þann þri 27.maí 2014 08:12, skrifaði Anders Stedtlund: >>>> >>>> Hi Gilles! >>>> >>>> I sent you a message with a link to an image! >>>> >>>> BTW, I have tested with a precompiled digiKam and it >>>> behaves >>>> the same for me. >>>> >>>> Anyone out there on openSUSE 13.1 with a working >>>> digiKam 4.0.0? >>>> >>>> /Anders >>>> >>>> >>>> Tested on openSUSE 13.1 (in Virtualbox): >>>> >>>> Browsing to software.opensuse.org/package/__digikam >>>> <http://software.opensuse.org/package/digikam> (or >>>> >>>> search for digikam), select digikam, select "Show other >>>> versions", select "Show unstable packages" below >>>> openSUSE 13.1 official release, gives you digiKam >>>> version 4.0.0 from the KDE:Extra repository. >>>> --> 1 Click Install opened with Yast2 leads through the >>>> setup, resolves dependencies and finalizes as digiKam >>>> 4.0.0-10.1 >>>> >>>> Nice splash screen, a lake with bridges. >>>> Sharpening/refocus seems to work OK, tested on some JPEGs. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Sveinn í Felli >>>> >>>> >>>> _________________________________________________ >>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/__listinfo/digikam-users >>>> <https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Oups, sorry. This one :
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335661 Gilles Caulier 2014-06-03 12:52 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: > Which entry? > > /Anders > > 2014-06-03 10:42 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>: >> Can you take a look to this entry if it can be the origin (directly or >> indirectly) of your problem ? >> >> Gilles Caulier >> >> 2014-05-27 11:34 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >>> Ah, good to know Sveinn! Not just my install then! :-) >>> >>> I haven't tried to save between resize and sharpen. I usually do all my >>> steps and then save! >>> >>> /Anders >>> >>> >>> 2014-05-27 11:32 GMT+02:00 Sveinn í Felli <[hidden email]>: >>> >>>> Þann þri 27.maí 2014 09:05, skrifaði Anders Stedtlund: >>>> >>>>> Thanks Sveinn! Might be something wrong with my installation >>>>> then... >>>>> >>>>> /Anders >>>> >>>> >>>> Maybe not. Tested your steps to reproduce and saw some strange things: >>>> >>>> Opened an image 1280x960 in the editor, zoom level to fit in window reads >>>> 85%. Then resized it to 200x150; zoom still reports it as 85% fit to window. >>>> Selected sharpening; still fit to window at 85%, clicked on 1:1 and zoom >>>> goes to 100% - BUT only the "before" preview image seems to respect that, >>>> the "after" preview is out of sync and seems even stretched. >>>> >>>> Tested again, but this time by saving the image between operations; this >>>> time the zoom levels and preview display are correct. >>>> >>>> Hope my descripion is clear. >>>> >>>> Food for thoughts... >>>> >>>> Sveinn í Felli >>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2014-05-27 11:01 GMT+02:00 Sveinn í Felli <[hidden email] >>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>>: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Þann þri 27.maí 2014 08:12, skrifaði Anders Stedtlund: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Gilles! >>>>> >>>>> I sent you a message with a link to an image! >>>>> >>>>> BTW, I have tested with a precompiled digiKam and it >>>>> behaves >>>>> the same for me. >>>>> >>>>> Anyone out there on openSUSE 13.1 with a working >>>>> digiKam 4.0.0? >>>>> >>>>> /Anders >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Tested on openSUSE 13.1 (in Virtualbox): >>>>> >>>>> Browsing to software.opensuse.org/package/__digikam >>>>> <http://software.opensuse.org/package/digikam> (or >>>>> >>>>> search for digikam), select digikam, select "Show other >>>>> versions", select "Show unstable packages" below >>>>> openSUSE 13.1 official release, gives you digiKam >>>>> version 4.0.0 from the KDE:Extra repository. >>>>> --> 1 Click Install opened with Yast2 leads through the >>>>> setup, resolves dependencies and finalizes as digiKam >>>>> 4.0.0-10.1 >>>>> >>>>> Nice splash screen, a lake with bridges. >>>>> Sharpening/refocus seems to work OK, tested on some JPEGs. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Sveinn í Felli >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _________________________________________________ >>>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> >>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/__listinfo/digikam-users >>>>> <https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>>> [hidden email] >>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Seems to be relevant. I have not croped the image though. I have resized it.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335652 Seems to be in the same area also! /Anders 2014-06-03 13:45 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>: > Oups, sorry. This one : > > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335661 > > Gilles Caulier > > 2014-06-03 12:52 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >> Which entry? >> >> /Anders >> >> 2014-06-03 10:42 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>: >>> Can you take a look to this entry if it can be the origin (directly or >>> indirectly) of your problem ? >>> >>> Gilles Caulier >>> >>> 2014-05-27 11:34 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >>>> Ah, good to know Sveinn! Not just my install then! :-) >>>> >>>> I haven't tried to save between resize and sharpen. I usually do all my >>>> steps and then save! >>>> >>>> /Anders >>>> >>>> >>>> 2014-05-27 11:32 GMT+02:00 Sveinn í Felli <[hidden email]>: >>>> >>>>> Þann þri 27.maí 2014 09:05, skrifaði Anders Stedtlund: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Sveinn! Might be something wrong with my installation >>>>>> then... >>>>>> >>>>>> /Anders >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Maybe not. Tested your steps to reproduce and saw some strange things: >>>>> >>>>> Opened an image 1280x960 in the editor, zoom level to fit in window reads >>>>> 85%. Then resized it to 200x150; zoom still reports it as 85% fit to window. >>>>> Selected sharpening; still fit to window at 85%, clicked on 1:1 and zoom >>>>> goes to 100% - BUT only the "before" preview image seems to respect that, >>>>> the "after" preview is out of sync and seems even stretched. >>>>> >>>>> Tested again, but this time by saving the image between operations; this >>>>> time the zoom levels and preview display are correct. >>>>> >>>>> Hope my descripion is clear. >>>>> >>>>> Food for thoughts... >>>>> >>>>> Sveinn í Felli >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2014-05-27 11:01 GMT+02:00 Sveinn í Felli <[hidden email] >>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>>: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Þann þri 27.maí 2014 08:12, skrifaði Anders Stedtlund: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Gilles! >>>>>> >>>>>> I sent you a message with a link to an image! >>>>>> >>>>>> BTW, I have tested with a precompiled digiKam and it >>>>>> behaves >>>>>> the same for me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyone out there on openSUSE 13.1 with a working >>>>>> digiKam 4.0.0? >>>>>> >>>>>> /Anders >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Tested on openSUSE 13.1 (in Virtualbox): >>>>>> >>>>>> Browsing to software.opensuse.org/package/__digikam >>>>>> <http://software.opensuse.org/package/digikam> (or >>>>>> >>>>>> search for digikam), select digikam, select "Show other >>>>>> versions", select "Show unstable packages" below >>>>>> openSUSE 13.1 official release, gives you digiKam >>>>>> version 4.0.0 from the KDE:Extra repository. >>>>>> --> 1 Click Install opened with Yast2 leads through the >>>>>> setup, resolves dependencies and finalizes as digiKam >>>>>> 4.0.0-10.1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Nice splash screen, a lake with bridges. >>>>>> Sharpening/refocus seems to work OK, tested on some JPEGs. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> Sveinn í Felli >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _________________________________________________ >>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> >>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/__listinfo/digikam-users >>>>>> <https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>>>> [hidden email] >>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>>> [hidden email] >>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Resize or Crop have the same effect about size size used internally by
editor. I look into code currently to found if something is wrong somewhere... Gilles Caulier 2014-06-03 13:52 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: > Seems to be relevant. I have not croped the image though. I have resized it. > > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335652 > Seems to be in the same area also! > > /Anders > > 2014-06-03 13:45 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>: >> Oups, sorry. This one : >> >> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335661 >> >> Gilles Caulier >> >> 2014-06-03 12:52 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >>> Which entry? >>> >>> /Anders >>> >>> 2014-06-03 10:42 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>: >>>> Can you take a look to this entry if it can be the origin (directly or >>>> indirectly) of your problem ? >>>> >>>> Gilles Caulier >>>> >>>> 2014-05-27 11:34 GMT+02:00 Anders Stedtlund <[hidden email]>: >>>>> Ah, good to know Sveinn! Not just my install then! :-) >>>>> >>>>> I haven't tried to save between resize and sharpen. I usually do all my >>>>> steps and then save! >>>>> >>>>> /Anders >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2014-05-27 11:32 GMT+02:00 Sveinn í Felli <[hidden email]>: >>>>> >>>>>> Þann þri 27.maí 2014 09:05, skrifaði Anders Stedtlund: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks Sveinn! Might be something wrong with my installation >>>>>>> then... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /Anders >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe not. Tested your steps to reproduce and saw some strange things: >>>>>> >>>>>> Opened an image 1280x960 in the editor, zoom level to fit in window reads >>>>>> 85%. Then resized it to 200x150; zoom still reports it as 85% fit to window. >>>>>> Selected sharpening; still fit to window at 85%, clicked on 1:1 and zoom >>>>>> goes to 100% - BUT only the "before" preview image seems to respect that, >>>>>> the "after" preview is out of sync and seems even stretched. >>>>>> >>>>>> Tested again, but this time by saving the image between operations; this >>>>>> time the zoom levels and preview display are correct. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hope my descripion is clear. >>>>>> >>>>>> Food for thoughts... >>>>>> >>>>>> Sveinn í Felli >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2014-05-27 11:01 GMT+02:00 Sveinn í Felli <[hidden email] >>>>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Þann þri 27.maí 2014 08:12, skrifaði Anders Stedtlund: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Gilles! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I sent you a message with a link to an image! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BTW, I have tested with a precompiled digiKam and it >>>>>>> behaves >>>>>>> the same for me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Anyone out there on openSUSE 13.1 with a working >>>>>>> digiKam 4.0.0? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /Anders >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tested on openSUSE 13.1 (in Virtualbox): >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Browsing to software.opensuse.org/package/__digikam >>>>>>> <http://software.opensuse.org/package/digikam> (or >>>>>>> >>>>>>> search for digikam), select digikam, select "Show other >>>>>>> versions", select "Show unstable packages" below >>>>>>> openSUSE 13.1 official release, gives you digiKam >>>>>>> version 4.0.0 from the KDE:Extra repository. >>>>>>> --> 1 Click Install opened with Yast2 leads through the >>>>>>> setup, resolves dependencies and finalizes as digiKam >>>>>>> 4.0.0-10.1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nice splash screen, a lake with bridges. >>>>>>> Sharpening/refocus seems to work OK, tested on some JPEGs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> Sveinn í Felli >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _________________________________________________ >>>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> >>>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/__listinfo/digikam-users >>>>>>> <https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>>>>> [hidden email] >>>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>>>> [hidden email] >>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>>> [hidden email] >>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
«
Return to digikam-users
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |