Looking at the latest OP's report it is more likely to be a bug in the Windows version of digikam. As it works in the open source world, if you are not able to contribute the patch the best you can do is: first, stay calm, second, let the developers know (create a detailed bug report), third, remain calm and hope they have resources to fix your bug quickly. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original message -------- From: Karl Günter Wünsch <[hidden email]> Date: 2018-01-30 11:32 AM (GMT-07:00) To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: All albums are removed if there is a network disconnection > But a local file *cannot* be "unavailable just for a short moment", And here I beg to differ. What if I move the files to another mounted drive? Still available but no longer in the place they were before. And IIRC some information aren't stored in the sidecar files but rather in the almost completely inaccessible (and ignored by most backup solutions as well as many tools implementing file system operations) extended attributes as the semantic desktop mandates, it's a pain to try and keep those information with the original files if at all possible (the networked drives don't support extended attributes and neither does the NTFS driver (even though that concept is available there too)... That mindset you just expressed has driven me away from digikam (after I ran into similar issues years ago - I honestly thought they had been addressed) and into the arms of the subscription of a commercial DAM (along with a switch to first Windows and then after a while to MacOS) - because they (unlike digikam) have embraced the concept that any information in the DAM should persist until such a time when the user actively chooses to remove it. There, even if I remove a file, move it to another drive, move it to a NAS or anything else - yes it will lose original file but it will show me that that connection has been broken and I can go ahead and reestablish it - I will not lose any information stored in the database. Why can't digikam do the same thing? If the file goes missing, amend the still existing preview with an icon telling the user that the original has vanished. If he then wants to do something with the original prompt him with the file dialog so that he can locate the original and thus regain access to it. If a whole folder has gone missing (by for example renaming to reflect the location) then locating one file would automatically reestablish database connection for the rest. That way digikam would be much more robust, it just doesn't bode well if the database information are still lost so easily... |
In reply to this post by woenx
Hallo, in regard to Why can't digikam do the same thing? If the file goes missing, amend the still existing preview with an icon telling the user that the original has vanished. If he then wants to do something with the original prompt him with the file dialog so that he can locate the original and thus regain access to it. If a whole folder has gone missing (by for example renaming to reflect the location) then locating one file would automatically reestablish database connection for the rest. That way digikam would be much more robust, it just doesn't bode well if the database information are still lost so easily... it is now a wish in the bug tracker: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389680 by extended attributes you talking about this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_file_attributes? 2018-01-30 15:04 GMT+01:00 Marc Palaus <[hidden email]>:
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |