Hello,
I was able to reproduce the problem with unsermake, also on ubuntu. In fact, the problem is not related to the distribution. I thought "make" on Daniel Bauer Suse version was defaulted to unsermake instead of make. But, I don't think it's the case. In my ubuntu system, make is gnu make and unsermake is only called with unsermake, not with any alias. I saw that "make -f Makefile.cvs" gave the warning about unsermake. In fact, it's the script itself that tries to use unsermake ! There's a perl script that detects what to use, detect-autoconf.pl : http://websvn.kde.org/branches/KDE/3.5/kde-common/admin/detect-autoconf.pl If you run this tool when unsermake is installed, it will try to use it : <<< digikam-svn/libs/admin$ ./detect-autoconf.pl AUTOCONF="/usr/bin/autoconf" AUTOHEADER="/usr/bin/autoheader" AUTOM4TE="/usr/bin/autom4te" AUTOMAKE="/usr/bin/unsermake -c" ACLOCAL="/usr/bin/aclocal" WHICH="type -p" export AUTOCONF AUTOHEADER AUTOM4TE AUTOMAKE ACLOCAL WHICH >>> Fortunately, there's a workaround with UNSERMAKE="no" . <<< digikam-svn/libs/admin$ export UNSERMAKE="no" ; ./detect-autoconf.pl AUTOCONF="/usr/bin/autoconf" AUTOHEADER="/usr/bin/autoheader" AUTOM4TE="/usr/bin/autom4te" AUTOMAKE="/usr/bin/automake" ACLOCAL="/usr/bin/aclocal" WHICH="type -p" export AUTOCONF AUTOHEADER AUTOM4TE AUTOMAKE ACLOCAL WHICH >>> So, I added it to the scripts : http://www.digikam.org/?q=download/svn and also in a new FAQ entry : http://www.digikam.org/?q=faq/digikam I hope this will fix the problem in any case :) Daniel, if you could try again with unsermake installed, it would be great ! PS: now that the scripts looks ok, I'll make an nice announce in the user list and maybe on the website (blog entry ?) :) -- Fabien _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Le Vendredi 17 Novembre 2006 12:24, Fabien a écrit :
> Hello, > > I was able to reproduce the problem with unsermake, also on ubuntu. In > fact, the problem is not related to the distribution. I thought "make" > on Daniel Bauer Suse version was defaulted to unsermake instead of make. > But, I don't think it's the case. In my ubuntu system, make is gnu make > and unsermake is only called with unsermake, not with any alias. > > I saw that "make -f Makefile.cvs" gave the warning about unsermake. In > fact, it's the script itself that tries to use unsermake ! > There's a perl script that detects what to use, detect-autoconf.pl : > http://websvn.kde.org/branches/KDE/3.5/kde-common/admin/detect-autoconf.pl > > If you run this tool when unsermake is installed, it will try to use it : > > <<< > digikam-svn/libs/admin$ ./detect-autoconf.pl > AUTOCONF="/usr/bin/autoconf" > AUTOHEADER="/usr/bin/autoheader" > AUTOM4TE="/usr/bin/autom4te" > > AUTOMAKE="/usr/bin/unsermake -c" > ACLOCAL="/usr/bin/aclocal" > > WHICH="type -p" > > export AUTOCONF AUTOHEADER AUTOM4TE AUTOMAKE ACLOCAL WHICH > > > Fortunately, there's a workaround with UNSERMAKE="no" . > > <<< > digikam-svn/libs/admin$ export UNSERMAKE="no" ; ./detect-autoconf.pl > AUTOCONF="/usr/bin/autoconf" > AUTOHEADER="/usr/bin/autoheader" > AUTOM4TE="/usr/bin/autom4te" > > AUTOMAKE="/usr/bin/automake" > ACLOCAL="/usr/bin/aclocal" > > WHICH="type -p" > > export AUTOCONF AUTOHEADER AUTOM4TE AUTOMAKE ACLOCAL WHICH > > > > So, I added it to the scripts : > http://www.digikam.org/?q=download/svn > > and also in a new FAQ entry : > http://www.digikam.org/?q=faq/digikam > > I hope this will fix the problem in any case :) > > Daniel, if you could try again with unsermake installed, it would be great > ! > > PS: now that the scripts looks ok, I'll make an nice announce in the > user list and maybe on the website (blog entry ?) :) yes, of course. Communication with end users is important. Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Fabien-5
On Friday 17 November 2006 12:24, Fabien wrote:
> Hello, > > I was able to reproduce the problem with unsermake, also on ubuntu. In > fact, the problem is not related to the distribution. I thought "make" > on Daniel Bauer Suse version was defaulted to unsermake instead of make. > But, I don't think it's the case. In my ubuntu system, make is gnu make > and unsermake is only called with unsermake, not with any alias. > > I saw that "make -f Makefile.cvs" gave the warning about unsermake. In > fact, it's the script itself that tries to use unsermake ! > There's a perl script that detects what to use, detect-autoconf.pl : > http://websvn.kde.org/branches/KDE/3.5/kde-common/admin/detect-autoconf.pl > > If you run this tool when unsermake is installed, it will try to use it : > > <<< > digikam-svn/libs/admin$ ./detect-autoconf.pl > AUTOCONF="/usr/bin/autoconf" > AUTOHEADER="/usr/bin/autoheader" > AUTOM4TE="/usr/bin/autom4te" > > AUTOMAKE="/usr/bin/unsermake -c" > ACLOCAL="/usr/bin/aclocal" > > WHICH="type -p" > > export AUTOCONF AUTOHEADER AUTOM4TE AUTOMAKE ACLOCAL WHICH > > > Fortunately, there's a workaround with UNSERMAKE="no" . > > <<< > digikam-svn/libs/admin$ export UNSERMAKE="no" ; ./detect-autoconf.pl > AUTOCONF="/usr/bin/autoconf" > AUTOHEADER="/usr/bin/autoheader" > AUTOM4TE="/usr/bin/autom4te" > > AUTOMAKE="/usr/bin/automake" > ACLOCAL="/usr/bin/aclocal" > > WHICH="type -p" > > export AUTOCONF AUTOHEADER AUTOM4TE AUTOMAKE ACLOCAL WHICH > > > > So, I added it to the scripts : > http://www.digikam.org/?q=download/svn > > and also in a new FAQ entry : > http://www.digikam.org/?q=faq/digikam > > I hope this will fix the problem in any case :) > > Daniel, if you could try again with unsermake installed, it would be great > ! ok, it works. installed unsermake again, compiled after svn up with first typing export UNSERMAKE=no and it passed without any problems :-) So, like this it works with different exivs & unsermake. Just for a test I opened 0.8.2 as standard-user, my "old" svn-digikam from June (as user test), plus the latest svn as user digi and had all three versions running simoultaneously... > PS: now that the scripts looks ok, I'll make an nice announce in the > user list and maybe on the website (blog entry ?) :) > > -- > Fabien Shouldn't this unsermake stuff be included in the "nomal" install procedure ("Install digiKam in your system (/usr)") too? Or does this only apply to the special "home directory install"? regards Daniel -- Daniel Bauer photographer Basel Switzerland professional photography: http://www.daniel-bauer.com Madagascar special: http://www.sanic.ch _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Daniel Bauer wrote:
> > ok, it works. > installed unsermake again, compiled after svn up with first typing > export UNSERMAKE=no > and it passed without any problems :-) Ok, fine ! > So, like this it works with different exivs & unsermake. Just for a test I > opened 0.8.2 as standard-user, my "old" svn-digikam from June (as user test), > plus the latest svn as user digi and had all three versions running > simoultaneously... :) With 3 different users, it's ok, but I would not recommend to do that with the same user :) > [...] > > Shouldn't this unsermake stuff be included in the "nomal" install procedure > ("Install digiKam in your system (/usr)") too? Or does this only apply to the > special "home directory install"? Why not... I added it. -- Fabien _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |