16 bit raw image

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

16 bit raw image

Bugzilla from dudasg@freemail.hu
I have compiled the digikam 0.9.0 just now. I like the sidebar with the EXIF
very much. Regarding to the new version: I have found that if I work on an raw
image everything on the image editor is much slower than before. Even the image
area selection.
Is this because of the 16 bit processing or some other reason?

Thanks!
Gabor
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 16 bit raw image

Gilles Caulier
Le Mardi 31 Janvier 2006 21:17, Dudas Gabor a écrit :
> I have compiled the digikam 0.9.0 just now. I like the sidebar with the
> EXIF very much. Regarding to the new version: I have found that if I work
> on an raw image everything on the image editor is much slower than before.
> Even the image area selection.
> Is this because of the 16 bit processing or some other reason?

yes, and ICC profile support too. The code need to be polished and optimized
(:=)))

Gilles
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 16 bit raw image

Martin Ehmke
Hi,

I just remember, that I am using ufraw
(http://ufraw.sourceforge.net/index.html) for raw conversion. It really works
quite nice and at least generating the preview is very fast, when comparing
to any other dcraw-wrapper. I don't know anything about how this is done and
if it is some "special trick", but maybe this could be useful for speeding up
the raw-viewing process.

Martin


On Tuesday 31 January 2006 23:10, Gilles Caulier wrote:

> Le Mardi 31 Janvier 2006 21:17, Dudas Gabor a écrit :
> > I have compiled the digikam 0.9.0 just now. I like the sidebar with the
> > EXIF very much. Regarding to the new version: I have found that if I work
> > on an raw image everything on the image editor is much slower than
> > before. Even the image area selection.
> > Is this because of the 16 bit processing or some other reason?
>
> yes, and ICC profile support too. The code need to be polished and
> optimized (:=)))
>
> Gilles
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users