Hi, I just notice something annoying with Digikam. First of all I think the matter came from CaptureNX, but it seems now, that Digikam is the source of this matter. I use Digikam svn version (updated today) with Ubuntu 10.10 64 bits. Here are the details : digiKam version 1.6.0 (rev.: 1196931) Dématriçage parallélisé: Oui Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier JP2: Oui Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier JPEG: Oui Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier PGF: Non Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier PNG: Oui Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier TIFF: Oui Exiv2 prend en charge les métadonnées XMP: Oui LibCImg: 130 LibClapack: internal library LibExiv2: 0.19 LibJPEG: 62 LibJasper: 1.900.1 LibKDE: 4.5.1 (KDE 4.5.1) LibKExiv2: 1.2.0 LibKdcraw: 1.2.0 LibLCMS: 118 LibLensFun: external shared library LibLqr: internal library LibPGF: 6.09.44 - internal library LibPNG: 1.2.44 LibQt: 4.7.0 LibRaw: 0.11.2 LibTIFF: LIBTIFF, Version 3.9.4 Copyright (c) 1988-1996 Sam Leffler Copyright (c) 1991-1996 Silicon Graphics, Inc. Élément graphique Marble: 0.10.1 LibGphoto2: 2.4.8 LibKipi: 1.2.0 Moteur de base de données: QSQLITE In fact, I edited some pictures with CaptureNX (under Virtualbox and a Digikam collection as a shared folder) after rating them with Digikam with in mind to only working on best ones. When I was working, I changed my mind about one picture, and add a rating to it, but when I'm going back in Digikam, the change has been viewed by Digikam since Digikam update its thumbnail, but the rating was not updated. What let me think that Digikam is responsible here, is if I'm going in "Image" menu and choosing "Lire à nouveau les métadonnées à partir de l'image" (read once again metadatas from the image or something like that in english), then, the rating appear correctly. After testing, it is the same thing for some other metadata like keywords. I check the option at the first start for Digikam to "scan for new item at start up", but apparently, modifications are viewed (thumbnail update), but metadatas are not rescanned. Is there anybody else experienced this ? Is there something I missed ? Thanks Regards, Nicolas -- Nicolas Boulesteix Photographe chasseur de lueurs http://www.photonoxx.fr _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Sorry, I didn't notice I used the wrong mail account... I don't know if
it's possible to cancel the first one (from nicolas boulesteix at laposte.net). I repost with the good email account. ------- Message réexpédié------- De: A: Sujet: Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 17:25:00 +0100 Hi, I just notice something annoying with Digikam. First of all I think the matter came from CaptureNX, but it seems now, that Digikam is the source of this matter. I use Digikam svn version (updated today) with Ubuntu 10.10 64 bits. Here are the details : digiKam version 1.6.0 (rev.: 1196931) Dématriçage parallélisé: Oui Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier JP2: Oui Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier JPEG: Oui Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier PGF: Non Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier PNG: Oui Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier TIFF: Oui Exiv2 prend en charge les métadonnées XMP: Oui LibCImg: 130 LibClapack: internal library LibExiv2: 0.19 LibJPEG: 62 LibJasper: 1.900.1 LibKDE: 4.5.1 (KDE 4.5.1) LibKExiv2: 1.2.0 LibKdcraw: 1.2.0 LibLCMS: 118 LibLensFun: external shared library LibLqr: internal library LibPGF: 6.09.44 - internal library LibPNG: 1.2.44 LibQt: 4.7.0 LibRaw: 0.11.2 LibTIFF: LIBTIFF, Version 3.9.4 Copyright (c) 1988-1996 Sam Leffler Copyright (c) 1991-1996 Silicon Graphics, Inc. Élément graphique Marble: 0.10.1 LibGphoto2: 2.4.8 LibKipi: 1.2.0 Moteur de base de données: QSQLITE In fact, I edited some pictures with CaptureNX (under Virtualbox and a Digikam collection as a shared folder) after rating them with Digikam with in mind to only working on best ones. When I was working, I changed my mind about one picture, and add a rating to it, but when I'm going back in Digikam, the change has been viewed by Digikam since Digikam update its thumbnail, but the rating was not updated. What let me think that Digikam is responsible here, is if I'm going in "Image" menu and choosing "Lire à nouveau les métadonnées à partir de l'image" (read once again metadatas from the image or something like that in english), then, the rating appear correctly. After testing, it is the same thing for some other metadata like keywords. I check the option at the first start for Digikam to "scan for new item at start up", but apparently, modifications are viewed (thumbnail update), but metadatas are not rescanned. Is there anybody else experienced this ? Is there something I missed ? Thanks Regards, Nicolas -- -- Nicolas Boulesteix Photographe chasseur de lueurs http://www.photonoxx.fr _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
No idea about that ?
Le Sun, 14 Nov 2010 17:30:49 +0100, Photonoxx <[hidden email]> a écrit:> > Hi, > > I just notice something annoying with Digikam. First of all I think the > matter came from CaptureNX, but it seems now, that Digikam is the source > of this matter. > > I use Digikam svn version (updated today) with Ubuntu 10.10 64 bits. Here > are the details : > > > digiKam version 1.6.0 (rev.: 1196931) > Dématriçage parallélisé: Oui > Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier JP2: Oui > Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier JPEG: Oui > Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier PGF: Non > Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier PNG: Oui > Exiv2 peut écrire dans un fichier TIFF: Oui > Exiv2 prend en charge les métadonnées XMP: Oui > LibCImg: 130 > LibClapack: internal library > LibExiv2: 0.19 > LibJPEG: 62 > LibJasper: 1.900.1 > LibKDE: 4.5.1 (KDE 4.5.1) > LibKExiv2: 1.2.0 > LibKdcraw: 1.2.0 > LibLCMS: 118 > LibLensFun: external shared library > LibLqr: internal library > LibPGF: 6.09.44 - internal library > LibPNG: 1.2.44 > LibQt: 4.7.0 > LibRaw: 0.11.2 > LibTIFF: LIBTIFF, Version 3.9.4 Copyright (c) 1988-1996 Sam Leffler > Copyright (c) 1991-1996 Silicon Graphics, Inc. > Élément graphique Marble: 0.10.1 > LibGphoto2: 2.4.8 > LibKipi: 1.2.0 > Moteur de base de données: QSQLITE > > > In fact, I edited some pictures with CaptureNX (under Virtualbox and a > Digikam collection as a shared folder) after rating them with Digikam > with > in mind to only working on best ones. > > When I was working, I changed my mind about one picture, and add a rating > to it, but when I'm going back in Digikam, the change has been viewed by > Digikam since Digikam update its thumbnail, but the rating was not > updated. > > What let me think that Digikam is responsible here, is if I'm going in > "Image" menu and choosing "Lire à nouveau les métadonnées à partir de > l'image" (read once again metadatas from the image or something like that > in english), then, the rating appear correctly. After testing, it is the > same thing for some other metadata like keywords. > > I check the option at the first start for Digikam to "scan for new item > at > start up", but apparently, modifications are viewed (thumbnail update), > but metadatas are not rescanned. > > Is there anybody else experienced this ? Is there something I missed ? > > Thanks > > Regards, > > Nicolas > > -- -- Nicolas Boulesteix Photographe chasseur de lueurs http://www.photonoxx.fr _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |